2026

Not everyone becomes self-employed by choice: sometimes it’s what happens when every other option disappears. The “great era of entrepreneurship” is just a response to a corporate culture that became increasingly bloated and dysfunctional: HR departments unable to recognize talent, algorithms reducing people to keyword matches, and DEI-driven hiring priorities that reward optics over competence. A lot of capable people didn’t leave the system voluntarily. The system stopped making room for them.

The loneliness crisis is often attributed to social media, and while that is partially true, there is another HUGE factor contributing to it: globalization.The moment people began competing not just with others in their hometown or country, but with the entire world, constantly moving from place to place became normalized.First comes university. Then comes the city with the best job opportunities. But job security is increasingly rare, so people often have to accept offers in different cities and move once again after a while.And this constant mobility has, on aggregate, weakened social bonds and made people lonelier.After all, how are you supposed to build a strong social circle if you can never truly put down roots? Or better yet, why even try if you know that within 12 to 24 months you may have to leave and never see those people again?

Credentialism is slowly dying because CVs are terrible proxies for competence. A résumé tells you where someone studied and worked. A profile here instead tells you how they think, what they’e curious about, how they communicate, who respects them, and whether they can consistently produce valuable ideas in public. That’s infinitely more informative. Once baseline technical skills are met, most jobs become learnable: what actually matters is judgment, adaptability, communication, taste, and the ability to think independently. And the internet made those traits visible for the first time at scale.

If you tolerate everything, you stand for nothing. What the past few decades tried to sell as virtue is actually a refusal to exercise judgment: pure weakness and cowardice masked by an attempt to get the moral high ground. The ultimate failure of leadership. When the median position refuses to set boundaries, it effectively subsidizes its own destruction by granting a free pass to the most radical actors. And in any system, be it a market or a society, if you don’t cut the losers, they eventually liquidate the whole.

The CV is a relic optimized for a world where expertise was opaque, credibility came exclusively from institutional gatekeepers (=brand names), and the only way to prove competence was through third-party validation on a piece of paper. Now you can demonstrate authority in real time, build social proof through consistent output, and showcase genuine competence before anyone even asks for your credentials. I believe that in a few decades, we’ll look at “having a good CV” the same way we now look at “walk in and shake the manager’s hand”.

Another clear example of the generational divide. For many people, a job is exactly that: a job. You clock in, clock out, and use the remaining hours to build a future that actually belongs to you. The old social contract of “time in exchange for stability” effectively died the moment housing became unaffordable and meaningful career progression stalled out. Gen Z understands this intuitively: they don’t tie their identity to an employer, especially given most roles are viewed as temporary placeholders anyway. When the traditional path to ownership is blocked, the only rational move is to stop treating a cubicle like a career and start treating it like a specialized cash-flow hedge. After all, if the employer has no loyalty to the person, isn’t it delusional to expect the person to have a spiritual connection to the office?

The highest-ROI investment I’ve made so far was joining Twitter and being able to DM anyone I found interesting. So many opportunities came out of it. I never needed a CV: my timeline and results spoke for themselves, and mutuals acted as social proof. I think the future looks much more like this, where everyone has a portfolio that demonstrates their skills, than a CV-based market like we have now (standard, as well as derivatives like LinkedIn).

Traditional 9-5 employment is actually two contracts: the explicit one (salary, hours, title) and the implicit one (loyalty, availability, career progression expectations). And by the standard form, the leverage is on the employer’s end. Still, nothing stops you from extracting as much value as possible while enjoying the relative safety net of predictable cash flow, so you can build your own leverage outside the company. And once you have that, you can renegotiate the explicit contract and bend the implicit one to your pleasing. It’s a takers’ market until you build your own hand.

There are so many people saying Gen Z is lazy or isn’t working as much, but that’s a gross oversimplification: they just don’t tie their identity to a temporary job. Maybe this is clearer with an example: – Before, you were a Google employee who made content on the side – Now, you’re a content creator who also happens to work at Google (for now) The moment your career identity is tied to something external to your employer, the traditional loyalty dynamic where the company holds the leverage over the employee starts to fall apart. This is what’s happening.

Flexibility and openness, these are the keys to living fully: any label you attach to yourself is an invisible cage, sometimes a gentle block, sometimes a wall. You need to be in constant flux. Changing. Realigning. Rediscovering yourself. Your identity must die again and again, only to be reborn stronger each time. This is what the Bible teaches, and what Christians around the world celebrate every Easter: crucify yourself, and rise anew.

High wealth creates declining birth rates Declining birth rates reduces prices Reduced prices create opportunities Opportunities create increasing birth rates Increasing birth rates create high wealth We started importing the third world instead of seeing asset prices decline just because boomers are scared of not having it easy their entire life
2025

We’re all traders, yet some people only apply market logic to financial markets. In reality, everything is a trade, if you look closely enough. Careers are no different. This is how the cycle works, every single time: 1) A new industry emerges with little status or prestige. 2) Big risk-takers make early moves. 3) As the industry grows, the rewards increase. 4) Eventually, it becomes popular. 5) Prep schools and training programs spring up. 6) Competition intensifies. 7) Payouts shrink, not just because of saturation, but because part of the compensation is now paid in status. 8) The industry plateaus. 9) Over time, even the status erodes. Sometimes, the cycle restarts. But more often, those who recognized the pattern early have already pivoted to another industry, seeding the next cycle there instead.

Opening a small unrelated parenthesis on this topic: the moment respect, honour, and loyalty become the foundation of a group, the only real difference between that group and a mafia is the presence (or absence) of criminal/violent intent. This isn’t because those qualities are inherently “mafia-like”, but because the mafia is built upon natural human social dynamics. And that’s precisely why it can’t truly be destroyed.

The ideal national leader is one who acts decisively without seeking attention; who remains out of the spotlight, not from absence but from honor, and from the strength that quiet leadership exudes; who negotiates behind closed doors, not for vanity, but to preserve dignity and project silent power. The more one is seen, the less powerful one becomes.

In the past, people developed themselves through experience and career achievements, before establishing a public image: this approach ensured that what they had to say was genuinely valuable, and their personal brand was strong and credible. Today, instead, it’s fairly common to see young people with minimal accomplishments presenting themselves as seasoned experts to build a public persona—think of the 20-something-year-olds proclaiming themselves as CEOs despite having no board of directors, or calling themselves entrepreneurs while effectively being unemployed. More often than not, the content they share is nothing more than recycled advice or borrowed experiences repackaged to appear original. Unsurprisingly, these brands are often weak and unstable. Do more, talk less.
2024

Saying that housing is the root cause of lower fertility rates is missing the forest for the trees. The fertility rate is declining worldwide because we are more materialistic than ever, which makes us less interested in pursuing goals greater than ourselves. In politics, this materialism leads to populism. In spirituality, it leads to atheism or agnosticism. In economics, it causes us to prioritize our careers over any other part of our lives. In society, it results in weaker social bonds and, therefore, more loneliness. Look around, and you will see that this is indeed what’s happening.







































































